[attachmentid=16353]
QUOTE(robben @ May 10 2005, 11:39 AM)
AMD's dual-core Opteron processors are extremely well executed on all fronts, based on what we've seen. AMD's dual-core design has a technical elegance that Intel's can't match, and that design brings superior performance. One Opteron 175 performs slightly better than a pair of Opteron 248s running at the same clock speed, and it does so while consuming less power than a single-core Opteron 152. All in all, very impressive.
...
So who should get a Dual-Core CPU? Well, if you read the article, you�d know that the answer is everyone � by the end of the year, when things move from the workstation to the home desktop. How about right now? Well, people who�ve always looked to dual processor machines (IT infrastructure, custom software, digital media) should strongly consider these new systems. Professional photographers who regular work with hundreds to thousands of images a day with cameras such as the 1Ds or 1D Mark II from should strongly consider getting a Dual Opteron system as their next upgrade. It truly is the �hardware accelerated RAW processor� that many have dreamed of.
Non avete letto abbastanza e comunque i processori sono gi� in commercio, i test sono gi� stati fatti.. proprio con le eos e nikon compresa la d2x

..
se non vi documentate o non ne avete voglia vi posto io il tutto.. anche se non ritengo giusto che se a uno gli interessa non possa con le sue forze farlo da solo.
Time to Process a Nikon D2H NEF (shorter is better)
[attachmentid=16353]
Time to Process a Nikon D2X NEF (shorter is better)
[attachmentid=16354]